Legal Opinion
Armond Norfleet v. Thomas Webster and Alejandro Hadded
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 3, 2006No. 05-1237PublishedCited by 374 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Armond Norfleet suffers from arthritis. While incarcerated in a federal prison at Milan, Michigan (“Milan”), Norfleet was given certain medical treatments for his arthritis, including Naprosyn and soft-soled shoes for his aching feet. On May 22, 2002, he was transferred to the federal prison at Terre Haute, Indiana (“Terre Haute”), where the medical authorities were not as sympathetic to his joint problems. A doctor at Terre Haute concluded the soft-soled shoes and other treatments were unnecessary, and pursuant to prison policy the drugs Norfleet had been taking for his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Herbert L. Board v. Karl Farnham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Anthony Riccardo v. Larry RauschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- John Walker v. Dr. Ivy Benjamin, Dr. Adrian Feinerman, Dr. Ansar Ansari, Dr. Virgilio Pilapil, Pamela Dunbar and Vickie RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by374 opinions
- Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Tyrone Petties v. Imhotep CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Grieveson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Calvin Whiting v. Wexford Health Sources, IncorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
369 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.