Legal Opinion

Murakami v. Machinist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*337Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered September 25, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion for a new trial on damages unless plaintiff stipulated to a reduction of the jury’s awards for past and future pain and suffering of $130,000 and $130,000, respectively, to $100,000 and $75,000, respectively, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion denied and the verdict reinstated. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff suffered a fractured clavicle that necessitated surgical repair when, as a pedestrian, he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tate v. ColabelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Donlon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Koplewicz v. Colony Ticket Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowenstein v. Normandy Group, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Elescano v. Eighth-19th Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API