Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brown v. Kelton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 2011No. 10-925Published

1ConcurrenceJim Hannah, Chief Justice

I concur in the result reached by the majority, but I write separately to set out the analysis by which I reach that same result. Brown correctly argues that Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-22-211 (Supp.2009) “cannot control the outcome of this case because the statute intrudes on this court’s exclusive power.” A statute, being an enactment of the legislative branch, may not control what is within the exclusive authority of the judicial branch. As the highest court in the judicial branch of government, this court holds exclusive authority over the regulation of the practice of law.1

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. R.I. Bar Asso. v. Auto. Service Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  2. STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Rhode Island Bar Ass'n v. Automobile Service Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
  4. Ark. Bar Assn. v. BlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Creekmore v. IzardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API