Legal Opinion
Roques v. Continental Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 8, 1931No. 13,636PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTERFIELD,. J.
The interesting question presented by this appeal involves the meaning of the phrase “arise and accrue” as employed in Act No. 172 of 1908, which, so far as it is pertinent to this discussion, provides:
“That all * * * life * * * insurance companies * * * shall, annually give a bond in favor of the State of Louisiana * * * in the full sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) * * * conditioned for the prompt payment of all claims arising and accruing to any person during the term of said bond by virtue of any policy issued by any such corporation upon the life or person of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amy v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States Ex Rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Johnson v. Humboldt InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Van Den Hul v. Baltic Farmers Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Louette v. Security Indus. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Grice v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Parish of Jefferson v. StansburyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.