Legal Opinion

Nuckolls & Phipps v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 16, 1920PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Grayson ■county on a motion to correct an erroneous assessment. Judgment for the Commonwealth. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

[1] The question raised by this record is whether a fund held by the Virginia executors of M. W. Cornett, constituting the proceeds of sale of 200 shares of stock of a national bank located in Missouri, made by the Missouri administrators, and, under the laws of that State, there subjected to a collateral inheritance tax, is also subject in this ¿State to an inheritance tax under the Virginia, statute.

■ The decedent was domiciled in Grayson county, Virginia, rand made a- will disposing of his estate by pecuniary lega■cies to his sister, nephews and nieces. The collateral inheritance tax…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Estate of SteehlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hunton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. In Re: Hillcrest Memorial GardensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hernandez v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API