Legal Opinion

Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 2007No. 79 MAP 2006PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The initial question presented is whether a landowner's acquiescence to the conduct of a meeting of a zoning hearing board to entertain written briefs, deliberate, and render a decision constituted a waiver of the statutory entitlement to a deemed approval of a special exception and variance, where the Board did not issue a written decision within forty-five days after the close of the evidentiary record. We also consider whether such a meeting constitutes a hearing for purposes of the forty-five-day requirement.

Pertinent to this question, Section 908(9) of the Municipalities Planning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaster v. Township of Nether ProvidenceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Hogan, Lepore & Hogan v. Pequea Township Zoning BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SELENSKISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Kaplin v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Gibraltar Rock, Inc. v. New Hanover TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Nextel Partners, Inc. v. Clarks Summit BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Oasis v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API