Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
The initial question presented is whether a landowner's acquiescence to the conduct of a meeting of a zoning hearing board to entertain written briefs, deliberate, and render a decision constituted a waiver of the statutory entitlement to a deemed approval of a special exception and variance, where the Board did not issue a written decision within forty-five days after the close of the evidentiary record. We also consider whether such a meeting constitutes a hearing for purposes of the forty-five-day requirement.
Pertinent to this question, Section 908(9) of the Municipalities Planning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gaster v. Township of Nether ProvidenceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hogan, Lepore & Hogan v. Pequea Township Zoning BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SELENSKISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Kaplin v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Gibraltar Rock, Inc. v. New Hanover TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Nextel Partners, Inc. v. Clarks Summit BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Oasis v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.