Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 2006No. CA CR 05-491Published

1DissentWendell L. Griffen, Judge

I join Judge Bird’s dissent because I agree that appellant exercised actual physical control over his vehicle. I also agree that the cases cited by the majority, Dowell v. State, 283 Ark. 161, 671 S.W.2d 740 (1984), and Stephenson v. City of Fort Smith, 71 Ark. App. 190, 36 S.W.3d 754 (2000), do not compel reversal because whether appellant exercised actual physical control over his vehicle is not determined by merely finding that his keys were not in the ignition of his running vehicle.

I write separately to further emphasize that appellant’s conduct represented precisely the type of public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dowell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Hodge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Stephenson v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API