Legal Opinion

Pair v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 22, 2011No. 1396PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

The compelled merger of convictions to avoid multiple punishments for the same offense, or perhaps for the same criminal behavior, is by no means as simple a subject as it *622might at first appear to be. The hydra has no less than three heads: 1) constitutional double jeopardy; 2) the rule of lenity as an aid to statutory construction; and 3) the essentially tetherless notion of fundamental fairness. These are no mere variations on a common theme. They are the subjects for widely differing inquiries. Fundamental fairness, especially, remains very much an enigma. All three are now before us.

The…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. United States v. Kevin BattleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Quansah v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API