Legal Opinion
David Jones v. Dushan Zatecky
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 28, 2019No. 17-2606PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, Chief Judge.
At the time of David Jones's arrest and prosecution in 2005, Ind. Code § 35-34-1-5 (1982) identified an "omnibus date" and allowed prosecutors to make substantive amendments to pending charges only up to 30 days before the omnibus date.1 Seven *580years earlier, in a case called Haak v. State , 695 N.E.2d 944, 951 (Ind. 1998), the Indiana Supreme Court had confirmed the strict nature of this deadline. Disregarding this rule, in Jones's case the state moved nine days after the omnibus date to amend the charging instrument to add a new and highly consequential charge of criminal…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Phillip Hartsfield v. Stephanie DorethyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Jeffery Bridges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- David Jones v. Rodney CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- DeWayne Perry v. Richard BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Antonio Ramirez, Jr. v. Lizzie TegelsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.