Legal Opinion

In re Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company Litigation

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided May 6, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00469Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION IN RE TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE ) Case No. 3:24-cv-00469 COMPANY LITIGATION ) ) Case No. 3:24-cv-00476 ) Case No. 3:24-cv-00478 ) Case No. 3:24-cv-00479 ) Case No. 3:24-cv-00483 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 105) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief Authorizing Immediate Possession (Doc. No. 110) are ripe for decision without any opposition. Both motions are GRANTED. To provide context and background, this is an eminent domain action under § 717f(h) of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  3. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Gail Brandon CochranCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 1.01 Acres, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Western Pocahontas Props. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API