Cohen v. Waldron
New York Supreme Court
Actiom of foreclosure.
1Opinion of the Court
.Pbyob, J.
To avert a threatened foreclosure of a mortgage on his property, defendant had this transaction with the plaintiff. Upon payment of the mortgage debt less 10 per cent, discount, plaintiff took an assignment of the mortgage; with the knowledge of plaintiff defendant paid the mortgagee the 10 per cent, balance, •whereupon plaintiff extended the mortgage for another year. In the action to foreclose, defendant pleads usury.
Upon its face, the transaction is clear of usury. In form, it is a purchase of a valid, subsisting security; and by all authorities, such a purchase, at any discount,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stillman v. . NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Union Dime Savings Institution v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Meaker v. . FieroNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Dunham v. . CudlippNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Wyeth v. . BraniffNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.