Legal Opinion
Elkman v. National States Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 2009No. B205919PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1309Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Esther Elkman (Elkman) appeals an order granting a motion to quash service of summons and complaint filed by defendant and respondent National States Insurance Company (National).1
National, an out-of-state insurer which is not licensed or authorized to do business in California, receives insurance premiums from California and processes and pays claims submitted by its insureds who are domiciled in this state. The essential issue presented is whether such circumstances provide a basis to justify the imposition of either general or specific jurisdiction…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greenwell v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Office Supply Store.com v. Kansas City School BoardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Elkman v. National States InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- ParaFi Digital Opportunities v. EgorovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- RDPH Properties v. Net Lease Capital Advisors CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014