Legal Opinion
Pezzoni v. Pezzoni
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 1918No. Civ. No. 2447PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
STURTEVANT, J., pro tem.
This is an action on a written contract for the payment of money. The plaintiff had judgment in the lower court for $475; but, contending that his recovery should have been for $625, the full amount claimed in the prayer of his complaint, he has appealed on the judgment-roll.
If the defendant is right in her interpretation of the written contract the judgment should be affirmed.
The contract sued on is set forth in the findings, and is as follows:
“This stipulation entered into by Victor Pezzoni of Osoflaco, San Luis Obispo County, California, and Pia Pezzoni, his wife,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blodgett v. UtleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
- Lee v. . McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Venuci v. CademartoriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- In re Jack SenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Graham v. GrahamDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940
- Polk v. BradburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932