Legal Opinion

Yohe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1984No. 83-142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We agree that there was no evidence to support the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay his costs of supervision. Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So.2d 607 (1947). Upon remand the trial court is instructed to correct this finding which was probably the result of a clerical error.

The appealed order is manifestly supported by other violations on the part of appellant and no other error has been demonstrated.

We particularly find that no error was committed by the trial court in requiring Yohe to identify himself as the probationer. State v. Heath, 343 So.2d 13…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  2. State v. HeathSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API