Legal Opinion
Clark v. Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 18, 1930No. 20590PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
On July 3, 1929, the State Industrial Commissioh entered an order denying compensation claimed by Virgil Clark, petitioner in this action. The vital and material part of that order follows :
“The State Industrial Commission * * * is of the opinion that the alleged injury of May 9, 1927, did not arise out of and in the course of claimant’s employment with the respondent within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. It is, therefore, ordered: That the claim of Virgil Clark for compensation for an alleged injury sustained on May 9, 1920', be and the same is hereby denied and this cause…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- McAlester Colliery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Skelly Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Lee Drilling Co. v. RalphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- State Highway Commission v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Forrester v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Fox v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936