City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. John Patterson (Pat) O'Callaghan
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
KITCHENS, JUSTICE,
DISSENTING:
¶ 55. Because a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding the point at which John and Patsy O’Callaghan knew or should have known that the City of Tupe-lo’s drainage ditch had damaged their property, I would affirm the County Court of Lee County’s denial of summary judgment. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
¶ 56. A “cause of action does not accrue until the plaintiff has discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury.” Miss. Code Ann. § 15-1-49(2) (Rev. 2012). In Angle v. Koppers, this Court interpreted Section 15-1-49(2) to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Caves v. YarbroughMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Weathers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Angle v. Koppers, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Vicksburg v. HermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.