Legal Opinion

State v. Catalano

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 13, 2012No. SC11-1166PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLabarga, J.

This case is before the Court on appeal from a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, State v. Catalano, 60 So.3d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), which declared section 316.3045, Florida Statutes (2007), to be invalid. We have jurisdiction.1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the Second District’s declaration that the statute is invalid because it is an unreasonable restriction on the freedom of expression. We also find that the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad, but not unconstitutionally vague. Finally, we find that section 316.3045(3) is not severable from the remainder of…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dr. Bernd Wollschlaeger v. Governor of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Kelvin Leon Jones v. Governor of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Kenneth R. Jackson v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. State of Florida v. Christopher Douglas WeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  5. Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, etc. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API