H. E. Lauffer Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Judge:
This case involves merchandise imported at New York in 1972 and 1973, consisting of articles described on the commercial invoices as “Anenome,” “Karelia,” “Rosemarin,” “Saara,” “Kosmos Brown,” “Ruska,” “Valencia” and “Oliivi.”
The merchandise was classified as articles chiefly used for preparing, serving, or storing food or beverages, or food or beverage ingredients, of nonbone chinaware or of subporcelain, available in specified sets having an aggregate value of over $10 but not over $24 in item 533.65, TSUS as amended; or available in specified sets having an aggregate value of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Bristle & Hair Drawing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Russ Togs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Webcor Electronics v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- International Seaway Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978