Legal Opinion
State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 2, 2001No. 44935-4-IPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 P.3d 298 (2001)
106 Wash.App. 876
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Ralph Andrew ROSS, Appellant.
No. 44935-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
July 2, 2001.
David Koch, Nielsen Broman & Assoc., Seattle, for Appellant.
Seth Fine and David Thiel, Snohomish County Pros. Office, Everett, for Respondent.
COX, J.
At issue is whether the trial court should have suppressed evidence of cocaine discovered during a search of Ralph Ross following his arrest on a misdemeanor warrant. Because there was no violation of RCW 10.31.030, the statutory authority under which Ross was in custody, we affirm.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.