Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McMahon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 5, 2012No. SC10-2425Published

1DissentCanady, C.J.

I dissent from the majority’s decision to approve the result reached by the Fourth District in State v. McMahon, 47 So.3d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). I would quash McMahon on the ground that the Fourth District erred in denying the State’s right to appeal the sentence imposed by the trial court where the sentence was imposed in violation of the express requirements of the habitual felony offender (HFO) statute.

Section 924.07(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2009), unambiguously authorizes the State to appeal from a criminal “sentence, on the ground that it is illegal.” The majority states that “the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Blakley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. State v. AkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  5. Exposito v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API