Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 19, 2014No. 1 CA-CR 13-0588PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWANN, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal requires us to decide whether the superior court erred by denying a motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of a warrantless search of a residence. We hold that the denial of the motion was error because the state failed to meet its burden to prove that a warrantless search was justified. We therefore reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Defendant Bradley Harold Wilson was indicted for production of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia based on evidence seized from his home in Taylor, Arizona. Before trial, Defendant filed a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Arizona v. Bradley Harold WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 2015