Graham v. State

Dissenting Opinion

DeBruler, C. J.

The errors argued in appellant’s brief are that the finding of the trial court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law. These errors were included in appellant’s motion for new trial but the motion was not accompanied by a memorandum, required *369by Supreme Court Rule 1-14B, specifying wherein the finding was not sustained by sufficient evidence or was contrary to law.

The majority refuses to determine on the merits the errors raised in appellant’s brief on the grounds that appellant’s trial counsel did not present those errors to the trial…