Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. White
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, District Judge.
This action was instituted by plaintiff against defendant to recover undercharges on 118 separate carload shipments made by defendant during the period of August, 1939, to February, 1941, which charges plaintiff contends must be collected in accordance with the lawfully published tariffs then in effect.
Like in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Judson Freight Forwarding Company, etc., D.C., 49 F.Supp. 789, this day decided by me, the question for determination is whether the shipper should have been billed for two forty-foot cars on each…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glickfeld v. Howard Van Lines, Inc. Howard Van Lines, Inc. v. GlickfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Western Pac. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950