Legal Opinion

Seely v. Beardsley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 21, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court.- — C. C. Hamilton, Judge. Appeal from a judgment of the district court of Iowa in and for Woodbury County granting a writ of habeas corpus and ordering the discharge of the petitioner from custody. Defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtDe Grape, J.

The cause of restraint as alleged is by virtue of an executive warrant issued by the governor of the state of Iowa on a requisition made by the governor of the state of Nebraska. There was no hearing had before the governor of *864this state. Tbe sufficiency of tbe requisition papers is not in question. The executive authority of the^ demanding state as well as tbe executive authority of this state found no defect therein. The trial court ruled that the petitioner is not a fugitive from the justice of the state of Nebraska. The proceedings being regular in form, it was incumbent upon the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Munsey v. CloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clayton v. WichaelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Evans v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Campbell v. MurrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hill v. HouckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Bicknell v. FarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API