Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 2, 1982No. 63716, 63760 and 63784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In Ferguson v. Ferguson, the western district, after opinion, ordered the cause transferred to this Court because of an apparent conflict with its opinion and both the eastern district cases of Pourney v. Seabaugh, 604 S.W.2d 646 (Mo.App.1980), and Swan v. Shelton, 469 S.W.2d 943 (Mo.App.1971), and this Court’s opinions in Northwestern Brewers Supply Co. v. Vorhees, 356 Mo. 699, 203 S.W.2d 422 (1947), and Wormington v. City of Monett, 358 Mo. 1044, 218 S.W.2d 586 (banc 1949).

The eastern district in Niedorf. v. Niedorf and Flynn v. DeSantis noted the apparent conflicts, and because Ferguson…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of HoltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Wormington v. City of MonettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Northwestern Brewers Supply Co. v. VorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Swan v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Pourney v. SeabaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Florio v. Florio (In Re Florio)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1995
  2. Beaver v. BeaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Foley v. FoleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Ivie v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support EnforcementMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Coleman v. ColemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API