Legal Opinion
West v. Haas
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 12, 1941No. 13599PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
Nothing will be added to what is stated in the first five headnotes. Only the ruling in the seventh will be discussed. Paragraph (g) of complainants’ prayer was, “That your petitioners have judgment against the defendant in the sum of $2500, and for attorneys’ fees for filing this suit.” This was demurred to on the ground that “nowhere in the petition are set forth facts that would warrant the recovery of attorneys’ fees for the filing of the suit.” Petitioners amended their petition in part, by adding thereto the following paragraphs: “24. Your petitioners aver that in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Traders Insurance v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Tift v. TownsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- O'Neal v. SpiveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Mosely v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atlanta Journal Co. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Week v. Big Bunker Hill Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Jeff Goolsby Homes Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Hart v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Townsend & Ghegan Enterprises v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.