Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Rule to show cause why the writ of certiorari, removing this case from the courts of criminal jurisdiction for the city and county of Philadelphia, should not be quashed.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court, delivered by

Lewis, C. J.

— This motion raises the question, whether the Supreme Court has authority to remove, for the purpose of trial, the cases pending and undetermined in the courts of criminal jurisdiction of the city of Philadelphia. The Act of 22d May, 1722, (1 Smith’s Laws, 140,) established the Supreme Court, and clothed it with powerto hear and determine, all and all manner of pleas, plaints, and causes which shall be removed and brought there, from the respective G-eneral Quarter Sessions of the Peace, Courts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. M'GinnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Soda Fountain Co. v. StolzenbachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  2. Summers v. KramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Commonwealth v. GibbonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Commonwealth v. FrowenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  5. Commonwealth v. Burns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API