Legal Opinion

Rodriguez-Pozos v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 2004No. 03-70364Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Rodriguez-Pozos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for re*907view of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Ge v. Ashcroft, 867 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2004), and deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that even if Petitioner’s testimony were taken as true, he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Gerardo Bibiano Falcon Carriche Theresa v. De Falcon Carriche and Christina Pamela Falcon Bibiano v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Li Chen Zheng, AKA Zheng Li Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Michael Andrew Gormley Edith Carol Gormley v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API