Legal Opinion
Noggle v. Bank of America Nt & Sa
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1999No. B119164, B119254PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
J.A number of residuary beneficiaries of several related testamentary trusts sued the bank acting as the trustee of all of the trusts. A judgment was entered in favor of the beneficiaries but for less than they thought was due to them. The bank appeals, contending specified claims were barred by a three-year statute of limitations. The beneficiaries cross-appeal, contending other claims were not (as the probate court found) barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.
Facts
Clyde E. Blosser and Alice R.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Miller v. Bechtel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Smith v. Baptist Foundation of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Murphy v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Key v. Tyler, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Britton v. GirardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.