Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. Mars

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 18, 1952Published

1DissentO’Sullivan, J.

In the paragraph just before the rescript, the opinion appears to indicate that an appeal from a probate decree upon an adoption matter requires the Superior Court to hold a trial de novo in the broadest sense in which that expression is used. If the paragraph is intended to give approval to that procedure, I must register a dissent, although I am in accord with the opinion as it determines the substantive law of the case.

The statute gives to the Court of Probate exclusive jurisdiction over proposed adoptions. General Statutes § 6866. Jurisdiction is acquired through the action of one or both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Home Trust Co. v. BeardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Gwynn v. TierneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API