La Mirada Ave. Neighborhood Ass'n of Hollywood v. City of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.
*1152Under *342Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5,1 a trial court may award attorney's fees to the "successful party" in a lawsuit that "has resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest" if, among other things, the lawsuit confers "a significant benefit" upon "the general public or a large class of persons." If a party is "successful" and has conferred a "significant benefit" by prevailing at trial and obtaining a judgment that a construction project violates the zoning laws in existence at the time, is that party precluded from obtaining attorney's fees under…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Beames v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Boppana v. City of Los Angeles CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Canyon Crest Conservancy v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.