Legal Opinion

La Mirada Ave. Neighborhood Ass'n of Hollywood v. City of L. A.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 3, 2018No. B282137PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffstadt, J.

*1152Under *342Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5,1 a trial court may award attorney's fees to the "successful party" in a lawsuit that "has resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest" if, among other things, the lawsuit confers "a significant benefit" upon "the general public or a large class of persons." If a party is "successful" and has conferred a "significant benefit" by prevailing at trial and obtaining a judgment that a construction project violates the zoning laws in existence at the time, is that party precluded from obtaining attorney's fees under…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Beames v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Boppana v. City of Los Angeles CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Canyon Crest Conservancy v. County of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API