United States v. Leblanc
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMitchell, Senior Judge
We concur with the entirety of the majority decision except on one issue: the allegation of error that Air Education and Training Command . Instruction (AETCI) 36-2909, Professional and Unprofessional Relationships, (2 March 2007) (certified current 26 September 2011), is not a lawful general regulation. On that portion of the opinion, we dissent.
Unlike the majority, we conclude that the primary purpose of Paragraph 2.17 of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 33-360, Publications and Forms Management, (18 May 2006) (incorporating changes through 12 July 2007),5 is to provide due process notice to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. WinckelmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. McGranerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.