Legal Opinion

United States v. Rusznica

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 1996No. 95-616-03PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

This Memorandum shall constitute our findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the amount of “loss” defendant Zdzislaw Rusznica, convicted of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, caused pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Fl.l(b)(l) and applicable case law. We will assume the reader is familiar with our Memorandum detailing our legal analysis and findings with respect to Rusznica’s co-defendant, Jan Kaczmarski, United States v. Kaczmarski, 939 F.Supp. 1176 (E.D.Pa.1996).

As will be seen below, Rusznica’s story is different in kind from Kaczmarski’s. Given…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. EgemonyeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. KaczmarskiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Nolan-CooperDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API