Legal Opinion
Ginsberg v. Lamour
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 13, 1998No. 97-3520PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GROSS, Judge.
Appellant, Morton Ginsberg, appeals a non-final order ruling that he had entered a general appearance submitting himself to the jurisdiction of the court. We have jurisdiction. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(I).
This is a personal injury action in which appellee, Mirielle Lamour, seeks damages on behalf of her son resulting from injuries he sustained when he fell through the railing of an apartment balcony. Ginsberg is alleged to be the owner of the apartment complex. By orders dated January 29, and May 13, 1997, the trial court quashed two attempts at service of process on Ginsberg.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cumberland Software, Inc. v. GREAT AM. MORTG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Santos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Kimbrough v. RoweDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Moo Young v. Air CanadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Zarcone v. LesserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Safety Assoc., Inc. v. Allstate Ins. CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- DiGiovanni v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Yakov Segalis v. Roof Depot USA, LLC and Billy M. Conrad and Mary OsbourneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Paradise of Port Richey v. Estate of Konstantinos BoulisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002