Legal Opinion

State v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1975No. 7526SC190Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for the reason that he was not afforded a speedy trial. This assignment has no merit.

Our courts have said many times that the word “speedy” cannot be defined in specific terms of days, months, or even years, therefore, the question whether a defendant has been denied a speedy trial must be determined in light of the facts in a particular case. The length and cause of the delay, prejudice to the defendant, and waiver by defendant are interrelated factors to be considered in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. ShoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API