Columbian Relief Fund Ass'n v. Hopper
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Comstock, J.
I can not agree with the conclusions reached by the majority of the court.
The material parts of the contract are: In the application: Q. 6. “Do you understand that if your monthly dues are not paid in advance on or before the third day of each month you stand suspended from receiving all benefits until reinstated as provided for in the by-laws?” A. “Yes.” In the policy: “This certifies that Walter Hopper is an acceptable member, and as such, during the time he shall pay his dues and his proportion of other expenses authorized by the by-laws, is entitled to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. HazelettIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Wheeler v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Yoe v. Benjamin C. Howard Masonic Mutual Benevolent Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.