Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 26, 1965No. 69632; protest 58/10534 (Galveston)Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Donlon, Judge:

I concur in finding that appraisement of this merchandise was at the recited higher value because of a clerical error, mistake of fact, or other inadvertence in preparation of the entries, as the protest alleges, and that the collector erred in refusing to reliquidate the entry to correct such error. Likewise, I join in the judgment order directing the relief which the protest prays, namely, correction of that error by a reliquidation limited to such correction, under authority of section 520, Tariff Act of 1930.

The parties have stipulated that: “By entering…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API