Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Boeger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill for an Accounting.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

If the petitioners under their agreement with the Cemetery Company, or anything done thereunder, became possessed of an interest in the subject-matter of the suit, they could and properly should have made themselves parties thereto. In chancery, suits are properly conducted in the name of the real parties in interest.

Did petitioners have an interest in the subject-matter of the suit? The agreement with petitioners was not an assignment to them of any portion of the subject-matter of the suit or that which might be obtained thereunder."

The agreement was, that petitioners should receive from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Chicago Street Railroad v. AckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Henchey v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Story v. HullIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bromwell v. TurnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  5. Wyman v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hills v. McMunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API