Legal Opinion
Capital Pure Assets, Ltd. v. CC Technology Corporation
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 16, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00680Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 CAPITAL PURE ASSETS, LTD., Case No. 2:24-cv-00680-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v. 10 CC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is an order to show cause why the Court should not abstain in 13 whole or in part in light of the marijuana-related aspects of the case. Docket No. 31. The parties 14 have briefed the issue. Docket Nos. 32-35. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will not 15 abstain and the order to show cause is discharged.1 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 CC Technology filed counterclaims predicated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Peridot Tree, Inc. v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024