Legal Opinion
Bridgehampton National Bank v. Watermill Heights Associates
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Oshrin, J.
Defendants Watermill Heights Associates and Elliot Gallin’s CPLR 5015 (a) (4) application to vacate the judgment of foreclosure for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted to the extent that a hearing shall be held.
*247The defendants Watermill Heights Associates and Elliot Gallin move to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and to enjoin a potential sale of the real property on the ground that service of process was not properly made, and that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over such defendants by delivery of a copy of the summons and complaint to one…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glasser v. KellerNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- Hickey v. Naruth Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Searing v. AnandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Anon Realty Associates, L.P. v. Simmons Stanley Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1992
- Di Giuseppe v. Di GiuseppeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Velez v. VassalloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Columbus Realty Investment Corp. v. Weng-Heng TsiangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Selmani v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Foy v. 1120 Avenue of the Americas AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Atkinson v. D.M.A. Enterprises, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.