Legal Opinion

Latham v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1929No. 21467Published

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse the Court of Appeals of Licking county. The original action was one on account for services rendered. The account sued upon was as follows:

Cora B. Clark, Administrator of Jonathan D. Bailey, Deceased, to Clara Latham, Dr.

To nursing, work and labor and various services performed, including looking after business affairs of Jonathan D. Bailey, from November, 1920, to November 1, 1926.......................$2,000.00.

This account was presented to the administratrix of the estate of Jonathan D. Bailey, was rejected, and the suit instituted.

The answer filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. SilvermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Claim of Gallagher v. Estate of BrewsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Gracie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. People's Savings Bank v. McInturffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Murdock v. SchindelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API