de Planter v. Kryger
New York Supreme Court
Motion by plaintiffs for judgment on the pleadings.
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
This action is properly brought. The answer presents no issue. There is no general denial and the defenses set up are not valid. The plaintiff had the right to sue the administratrix without having previously filed his claim with her as such. There is no restriction upon the right to commence an action upon a contract against an administrator where the claim has not been submitted to the administrator. Decedent Estate Law, §§ 116, 117. The general rule is that unless there is some statutory requirement to the contrary, the presentation of a claim to the personal representative of a decedent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baggott v. BoulgerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
- Olmstead v. LatimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Martine's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of GellisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of BaldwinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Elwyn v. ComeauNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Friedberg v. Mechanics Bank of BrooklynCity of New York Municipal Court · 1929