Legal Opinion

Kincade v. Cargill, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 16, 2000No. 83,908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marquardt, J.:

James L. Kincade appeals the Kansas Division of Workers Compensation Board’s (Board) decision denying his claim for workers compensation because he did not timely file his application for a hearing. We affirm.

Kincade began working for Cargill in 1976, where he had worked as a bailer, packer, and loader. In November 1991, Kincade helped some co-workers move a motor and turned his hip. Kincade said that he had to “lean over” for the rest of the day.

Kincade saw Dr. Frye on November 20, 1991. Dr. Frye noted that Kincade was in “obvious severe pain” and told him to stay off work. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Gleason v. Samaritan Home & Church Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Guerrero v. Dold Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. Thomason v. StoutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  2. Evans v. Frakes TruckingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  3. Torres v. De SantiagoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API