Legal Opinion

Albert v. Solimon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that the examination room of the medical office of the orthopedic surgeon, into which plaintiff brought her service dog, was not a “public facility” within the meaning of Civil Rights Law § 47. No other issue is before us.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Wesley and Rosenblatt. Taking no part: Judge CiPARICK.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burton v. MattelianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Cave v. East Meadow Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Watts v. Champion Home Builders Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Allen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Demetrius H. v. Mikhaila C.M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API