Legal Opinion

Boothman v. Wulfing

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 17, 1915No. Gen. No. 19,417PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward T. Wade, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Pitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff, C. R. Boothman, was employed by Coxe Brothers, contractors, as a foreman of bricklayers, and in pursuance of his employment, performed work and labor upon a building which Coxe Brothers were constructing for the defendant, II. E. Wulfing. The contractors having failed to pay him in full for his work, Boothman served a notice to that effect upon the owner, Wulfing, as provided by section 24 of the Mechanics’ Liens Act (J. & A. ¶ 7162), and after the lapse of ten days brought suit in the Municipal Court against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Illinois Malleable Iron Co. v. BrennanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Smith v. SlaughterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rubin v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API