Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Hunt

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, by ¡Dermission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 14, 1903, vyhich affirmed an order of the Rensselaer County Surrogate’s,Court requiring the executrix herein to file a supplemental account.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by ¡Dermission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 14, 1903, vyhich affirmed an order of the Rensselaer County Surrogate’s,Court requiring the executrix herein to file a supplemental account. The following questions were certified: “ 1. Does the will of Thomas Hunt, taken in connection with such extrinsic facts as appear and may be properly considered, vest in the widow an absolute title to his real and personal estate % “ 2. Does the will of Thomas Hunt, taken in connection with such extrinsic facts, vest in the…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on opinions below. First and second questions certified answered in the negative; fourth question answered in the affirmative, and third question not answered because not passed upon by either court below.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray and Haight, JJ.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Proceedings for the Probate of the Will of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908
  2. In re SvenningsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. In re SvenningsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API