Legal Opinion
Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, APC v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided October 20, 2014No. Docket No. 27364-12UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENGSTROM, LIPSCOMB & LACK, APC, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, APC v. Comm'r
Docket No. 27364-12
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 2014-221; 2014 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 217; 108 T.C.M. (CCH) 476;
October 20, 2014, Filed
Decision will be entered under Rule 155.
Kevin M. Bagley, for petitioner.
Monica D. Polo, for respondent.
GOEKE, Judge.
GOEKE
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
GOEKE, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, APC's (petitioner or EL&L) Federal income tax for 2008 through 2010 and accuracy-related…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, APC v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
- Peterson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015