United States v. William Carl Andrews, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
William Carl Andrews, Jr., appeals pro se from the judgment convicting him of aiding and abetting others in carrying on without giving bond, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5601(a) (4), the business of distiller. He bases this appeal solely upon the ground that the evidence against him was insufficient to support his conviction. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that his conviction must stand. 1
On a motion for acquittal the relevant inquiry is whether the evidence is sufficient upon which a jury might reasonably base a finding that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Melvin Edmond Surrett and Billy Charles Walden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Craig Warner, April Covey, Samuel L. Kranzthor, Fred W. Daniels, Jr., Friedae. Edwards, Frank Daniels and Michael A. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. John T. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Obadiah StephensonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Oscar Squella-AvendanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Russell J. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.