Legal Opinion
Loza v. Mitchell
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 31, 2010No. 2:98-cv-00287PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge.
Petitioner, a prisoner sentenced to death by the State of Ohio, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed his original habeas corpus petition (Doc. # 6), to which Respondent responded with a Return of Writ (Doc. # 11). Thereafter, this Court issued a Opinion and Order dismissing the following claims as procedurally defaulted: seven, nineteen, twenty (paragraph 252), twenty-six, and thirty-three.
The Court permitted some factual development in this case. By prior order, this Court issued a decision…
2Cases cited203 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jose Loza v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Render v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- State v. Keith Allan BrownIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
- Brown v. FenderDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Henize v. Warden Noble Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.