Hughes v. Standard Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, Jr., Chief Judge.
Tried to the Court without a jury, the action is for benefits claimed as due to plaintiff’s ■ minor son under a policy of life insurance issued to her husband by defendant. The suit began in the State *491Court, and was removed here on grounds of diversity of citizenship.
The background facts are not in dispute, the sole controversy being whether the death of the insured, William Watson Hughes, comes within the double indemnity provision of the policy, reading as follows;
“Accidental Death Benefit
“The Standard Life Insurance Company of Indiana * * * (for an additional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'n v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
- Konrad v. Union Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
- Carnelious v. Louisiana Industrial Life Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Standard Life Insurance Company of Indiana v. Ada Bell Brown HughesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Hughes v. Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1956